Presentation to Judicial College of Maryland

Glass Houses Proverb—Don’t Throw Stones and Invective
July 14, 2026
“Judges blast lawyers for citing hallucinated cases, but ethics pros say rule changes not needed”
July 18, 2026

It was a pleasure and an honor to assist the Hon. Lynne Battaglia (ret.) in a presentation to the Judicial College of Maryland with Craig Ball, Maura Grossman, and Alicia Shelton titled “AI & Other Digital Evidence: A Demonstrative Workshop for Judges.”

The program covered authentication issues regarding acknowledged and unacknowledged GenAI evidence, as well as the proposed Maryland anti-hallucination rule and a proposed amendment to its old, but innovative rule on computer-generated evidence.

General Maryland A.I. case law was discussed, as well as three Maryland decisions on hallucinated cases.  Several important federal and state decisions were also covered.

A deep dive was taken into the details of the well-known Pikesville deep fake audio case, with a presentation of some of the expert evidence used in debunking that audio.

AI protective orders were discussed, among other topics.

The afternoon session consisted of three demonstrative Q&A sessions.

First, an expert witness examined an actual deepfake video and provided the basis for, and his opinion that, it was a deepfake.

Next, two parties represented by counsel, but without an expert proffered and objected to authentication of that deepfake video.

Finally, two unrepresented parties in a contested family law case attempted to present and object to that video.

Sanctions for hallucinated citations under special provisions regarding best interests of a child were also discussed.

Craig illustrated the ease of making a deepfake:

Craig Ball Deepfake

 

Share