“The AI Incident Database”

Trial Court’s Order Contained Hallucinated Mistake
June 19, 2026
Is it OK if “Actual Authorities” Support the “Bogus” Proposition Set Out in a Hallucinated Case?
June 20, 2026

The Artificial Intelligence Incident Database reports harms or near harms from A.I.

The database states: “Like similar databases in aviation and computer security, the AI Incident Database aims to learn from experience so we can prevent or mitigate bad outcomes.”

For example, Incident 74: Detroit Police Wrongfully Arrested Black Man Due To Faulty FRT.  That post cross-references multiple additional posts on similar topics. See

Facial recognition technology is a form of AI and it is heavily regulated in Maryland criminal cases.

Some seem too good to be true – – Incident 1504: Nonfiction Book ‘The Future of Truth’ Reportedly Included AI-Generated and Misattributed Quotations.  “Steven Rosenbaum’s nonfiction book The Future of Truth reportedly included AI-generated or misattributed quotations after he used ChatGPT and Claude while working on the book. The New York Times reported that more than half a dozen quotations in reviewed sections were synthetic or wrongly attributed, including passages assigned to named writers and scholars. Rosenbaum later acknowledged the errors as accidental and said affected passages would be reviewed for correction.”  See also ‘The Future of Truth’ Contains Quotes Made Up by A.I. – The New York Times

Others are concerning.

The 1,537 records go back at least a decade. The scope is substantial.

Of course, hallucinated case citations are covered.

Thanks to Doug Austin for his initial coverage of this resource. The AI Incident Database (eDiscovery Today, Jun. 9, 2026).

Share