Berman Rebuts Opponent’s Argument

Trial Court Argument on Slots Referendum
April 16, 2010
Berman’s Objections to Proffered Evidence Sustained
May 26, 2010

When opponents of the referendum petition argued that CASM is a “non-existent entity” created by the jockey club to disguise its involvement in the petition drive, they said:  “It [CASM] was a deception to the prospective signers.”

Michael Berman, arguing for CASM and others, responded:  “I am here representing the non-existent entity CASM.” After the May 25, 2010, argument, the matter was ultimately heard by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, which ruled in favor of CASM.